Creating an Effective Cheap Compliance Manual Framework

Cost-Saving Strategies for Developing Compliance Manuals

Five Proven Methods to Reduce Compliance Manual Development Costs

Key Principle: Cost savings in compliance manuals derive from minimizing redundant content creation, automating repetitive tasks, and leveraging external or pre-existing resources without sacrificing accuracy.

1. Template Reuse and Modular Design
   Compliance manuals frequently share foundational elements (e.g., definitions, reporting structures, or risk assessment frameworks) across regulatory domains. By structuring manuals into reusable sections—such as policy templates, procedural workflows, or compliance checklists—organizations can reduce development time by 40–60% for subsequent updates or new regulations.
   • Implementation Steps:
     1. Audit existing compliance documents to identify overlapping sections (e.g., data privacy policies, whistleblower procedures).
     2. Develop a master template library categorized by function (e.g., "Record-Keeping," "Training Documentation," "Audit Trails").
     3. Use version-control tools (e.g., Google Docs, Confluence) to track updates and ensure consistency across manuals.
     4. Assign a compliance officer to maintain the template repository, with quarterly reviews for obsolescence.
   • Example: A financial services firm reduced its anti-money laundering (AML) manual update time from 12 weeks to 4 weeks by repurposing its existing fraud detection procedures template for new sanctions screening requirements.
2. Outsourcing to Specialized Vendors or Freelancers
   Outsourcing compliance manual development to subject-matter experts (SMEs) or legal tech firms can cut internal labor costs by up to 50%, particularly for niche regulations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA). However, transparency in vendor selection is critical to avoid hidden fees or subpar deliverables.
   • Vendor Selection Checklist:

     Criteria	Key Questions to Ask Vendors
     Pricing Structure	Is pricing based on fixed deliverables (e.g., per policy section) or hourly rates? Are there additional costs for revisions or regulatory updates?
     Deliverable Clarity	Will the manual include version-controlled digital copies, training materials, or audit-ready documentation? Are there guarantees on compliance accuracy?
     Expertise Validation	Can the vendor provide case studies or references from similar industries? Do their team members hold certifications (e.g., CCP, CISSP) relevant to your regulatory needs?
     Turnaround Time	What is the estimated timeline for drafts, reviews, and final approvals? Are there penalties for delays?
     Post-Implementation Support	Will the vendor offer periodic updates for regulatory changes (e.g., annual GDPR amendments) at a fixed cost?

   • Best Practice: Engage vendors for high-complexity sections (e.g., legal interpretations) while retaining in-house oversight for brand consistency and cultural alignment.
3. Automated Compliance Tools and AI-Assisted Drafting
   Emerging tools such as compliance automation platforms (e.g., LogicManager, Vanta) and AI-driven legal assistants (e.g., Casetext, Harvey AI) can generate draft policies, flag inconsistencies, and update manuals based on regulatory changes. These tools reduce manual drafting time by 70% for routine sections.
   • Implementation Steps:
     1. Identify repetitive or data-heavy sections (e.g., disclosure forms, training modules) for automation.
     2. Integrate tools with existing document management systems (e.g., SharePoint, Notion) to centralize updates.
     3. Use AI to cross-reference manual content against databases like Regulatory Transparency and Open Government (RTOG) or Westlaw for accuracy.
     4. Allocate a compliance analyst to monitor tool-generated updates and validate exceptions (e.g., industry-specific deviations).
   • Example: A healthcare provider used an AI tool to auto-generate HIPAA compliance checklists, reducing annual update costs by $25,000 while improving audit readiness.
4. Leveraging Free/Low-Cost Legal and Regulatory Resources
   Government agencies, industry bodies, and open-access platforms provide pre-approved compliance frameworks that can be adapted with minimal customization. Organizations can populate 60–80% of a manual’s content using these resources, slashing development costs by up to 75%.
   • Step-by-Step Guide to Resource Utilization:
     1. Source Identification:
        • Government Portals: OSHA (Occupational Safety), SEC (Securities), FTC (Consumer Protection).
        • Industry Associations: ISO (International Standards), AICPA (Accounting), IAPP (Privacy).
        • Open-Access Repositories: UNODC (Drug Control), WHO (Health Regulations), EU’s e-Justice Portal.
     2. Content Extraction:
        • Download regulatory guides (e.g., SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations) and extract key requirements.
        • Use text-analytics tools (e.g., MonkeyLearn) to categorize clauses by topic (e.g., "Record Retention," "Conflict of Interest").
     3. Customization Framework:
        • Map extracted content to your organization’s structure (e.g., align ISO 27001 controls with IT security policies).
        • Highlight gaps requiring legal review (e.g., jurisdiction-specific amendments).
     4. Validation:
        • Cross-check with internal legal counsel to ensure no critical exclusions (e.g., proprietary risk thresholds).
        • Document sources for audit trails (e.g., "Section 3.2 adapted from OSHA 1910.1200").
   • Example: A manufacturing firm adopted OSHA’s General Duty Clause template for workplace safety, customizing only 20% of the content for its specific hazards, saving $18,000 in legal drafting fees.
5. Phased Development and Prioritization
   Not all compliance requirements demand immediate attention. A phased approach—focusing on high-risk, high-impact areas first—allows organizations to allocate budgets incrementally while maintaining regulatory coverage.
   • Prioritization Matrix:

     Regulatory Area	Risk Level (1–5)	Development Phase	Estimated Cost Savings
     Data Privacy (GDPR/CCPA)	5	Phase 1 (Core Policies)	40% (via template reuse)
     Environmental Regulations (EPA)	3	Phase 2 (Pro Structural and Content Optimization for Affordability Cost-effective compliance manuals rely on adaptable structures that minimize redundancy while maximizing clarity and scalability. A modular framework ensures that updates to specific regulations or internal policies do not necessitate rewriting entire documents, reducing labor costs and version control errors. Visual-first alternatives further optimize affordability by leveraging intuitive design tools that lower production expenses while enhancing comprehension for small teams with limited compliance expertise. Modular Framework for Compliance Manuals A modular framework divides compliance content into self-contained sections that can be revised independently. Each module addresses a distinct regulatory or operational area (e.g., data privacy, workplace safety, anti-bribery) and follows a standardized template for consistency. This approach allows organizations to update only the relevant module when laws or internal policies change, rather than reprinting or redistributing an entire manual. Key Components of a Modular Structure: Header Section: Includes the module title, version date, and responsible department for updates. Regulatory References: Lists applicable laws, standards, or internal policies (e.g., GDPR for data privacy, OSHA for safety). Core Content: Broken into subsections like Definitions, Requirements, Procedures, and Examples. Update Log: Tracks revisions with dates, authors, and reasons for changes (e.g., "Updated to reflect California’s 2023 data privacy amendments"). Examples of Interchangeable Modules: Data Privacy Module: Covers GDPR, CCPA, or sector-specific regulations with fields for data mapping, breach protocols, and vendor contracts. Workplace Safety Module: Aligns with OSHA or local occupational health laws, including injury reporting forms and PPE requirements. Anti-Bribery Module: Integrates FCPA or UK Bribery Act clauses, with case studies and gift/entertainment policies. Remote Work Module: Addresses telecommuting policies, cybersecurity for home offices, and ergonomic guidelines. Implementation Benefits: Reduced Redundancy: Common elements (e.g., glossaries, contact lists) are stored in a shared template. Version Control: Modules can be tagged with compliance deadlines (e.g., "GDPR Module v3.2 – Effective May 2024"). Cross-Referencing: Modules link to related sections (e.g., a data privacy module may reference the IT security module). One-Page Compliance Overview Template Small teams require concise, actionable summaries to prioritize compliance tasks without drowning in dense documentation. A one-page overview consolidates key requirements, risks, and deadlines into a printable or shareable format. This template uses a risk-matrix approach to highlight critical actions, with visual cues (e.g., color-coding) to distinguish urgency levels. Template Structure: | COMPLIANCE OVERVIEW | | Organization: [Name] | | Effective Date: [YYYY-MM-DD] | | Prepared by: [Department] | | SECTION 1: KEY REQUIREMENTS | | [Bullet-point list of 3–5 critical | | regulations/policies, e.g.:] | | - Data Privacy: GDPR/CCPA compliance | | - Workplace Safety: OSHA annual audit | | - Anti-Bribery: FCPA training records | | SECTION 2: RISK ASSESSMENT | | High Risk (Red): [Action + Deadline]| | - [Example: "Submit GDPR DPIA by Q3 2024"] | | Medium Risk (Yellow): [Action] | | - [Example: "Review PPE inventory quarterly"] | | Low Risk (Green): [Action] | | - [Example: "Document remote work setup"] | | SECTION 3: ACTION ITEMS | | Owner | Task | Deadline | | [Name] | [Task, e.g., "Update privacy policy"] | [Date] | | [Name] | [Task] | [Date] | | SECTION 4: RESOURCES | | - Manual Sections: [Links to modules] | | - Tools: [Software/platform names] | | - Contacts: [Compliance officer email] | Design Principles for Affordability: Minimalist Layout: Uses tables and icons (e.g., 🚨 for high-risk items) to avoid costly design work. Dynamic Updates: Sections 2 and 3 are refreshed quarterly, while Section 1 remains static unless regulations change. Digital/Print Compatibility: Formatted for A4/Letter size with 12pt font and high contrast for readability. Example Use Case: A 10-employee startup uses this template to: Train new hires on critical policies during onboarding. Post it in break rooms for quick reference. Share it via email with vendors requiring compliance verification. Visual-First Alternatives to Text-Heavy Manuals Traditional compliance manuals often exceed 100 pages, increasing printing, translation, and distribution costs. Visual-first alternatives—such as infographics, flowcharts, and decision trees—reduce production expenses by 30–50% while improving retention rates by up to 65% (Source: Journal of Applied Psychology, 2019). These formats leverage free or low-cost tools (e.g., Canva, Lucidchart) and are easier to update than dense text. Comparison of Traditional vs. Visual-First Approaches: Aspect Traditional Manual Visual-First Alternative Production Cost High (printing, binding, translations) Low (digital tools, scalable formats) Update Frequency Infrequent (annual revisions) Frequent (real-time edits via digital tools) Readability Low (dense text, legal jargon) High (icons, color, hierarchical structures) Accessibility Limited (physical copies only) Universal (mobile-friendly, screen-reader compatible) Training Efficiency Low (requires guided sessions) High (self-explanatory for end-users) Examples of Visual Modules: Flowchart for Incident Reporting: Steps: Identify → Document → Escalate → Close with conditional branches for severity levels. Tool: Lucidchart or Microsoft Visio. Cost: Free tier available; complex diagrams cost <$10/month. - Infographic for Data Privacy: Sections: What Data We Collect (tables), Your Rights (icons), Breach Steps (numbered list). Tool: Canva (templates under $10) or Piktochart. Cost: One-time design fee or DIY in <2 hours. - Decision Tree for Compliance Exceptions: Branches based on user roles (e.g., Employee vs. Vendor) and scenarios (e.g., Emergency Data Access). Tool: Draw.io (free) or Miro. Cost: Zero for basic versions; premium features optional. Cost-Saving Strategies for Visual Content: Repurpose Existing Data: Convert text from policies into visuals (e.g., turn a 5-page anti-bribery policy into a 1-page flowchart). Use Public Templates: Platforms like Canva offer compliance-themed templates (e.g., "Privacy Policy Infographic"). Prioritize Digital Distribution: Eliminate printing costs by hosting visuals on intranets or shared drives. Cost-Effective Formatting Table for Compliance Content The following table maps content types to affordable formatting options, tools, and ideal use cases. Each row balances production cost with functional clarity, ensuring small teams can maintain compliance without outsourcing design. Content Type Cost-Effective Formatting Tools to Create It Best Use Case Policies Bullet-point lists with bolded key terms; numbered steps for procedures. Google Docs (free), Microsoft Word (built-in templates). Internal training materials, new hire onboarding packets. Regulatory References Side-by-side tables comparing laws (e.g., GDPR vs. CCPA columns). Excel/Google Sheets (free), Tableau Public (free for basic visuals). Tools and Technologies for Budget-Friendly Compliance Cost-effective compliance management relies on leveraging open-source, freemium, and collaborative tools to automate manual processes, simplify documentation, and enhance teamwork without excessive financial burden. These solutions reduce dependency on proprietary software while maintaining regulatory accuracy and operational efficiency. The adoption of budget-friendly technologies streamlines compliance workflows by integrating automation, plain-language generation, and cloud-based collaboration. Organizations can achieve compliance at a fraction of traditional costs by prioritizing scalable, low-maintenance tools and optimizing feature usage based on immediate needs. Open-Source and Freemium Tools for Compliance Automation Open-source and freemium tools eliminate licensing costs while providing robust functionalities for compliance manual generation, version control, and template customization. These tools often integrate seamlessly with existing workflows, reducing the need for specialized IT infrastructure. Key Tools and Their Workflows Markdown-Based Compliance Editors (e.g., Typora, VS Code with Markdown Extensions) These editors support structured documentation with version control via Git integration (e.g., GitHub, GitLab). Workflow: Draft compliance policies in Markdown for readability and compatibility. Use Git repositories to track changes, assign reviewers, and enforce approval workflows. Export finalized documents to PDF or HTML for distribution, ensuring traceability through commit history. Document Generation Engines (e.g., Pandoc, LaTeX) Automate template-based compliance manuals by converting Markdown or LaTeX source files into standardized formats. Workflow: Define reusable templates (e.g., GDPR clauses, SOX checklists) in LaTeX or Markdown. Use Pandoc to generate PDFs, Word documents, or web-friendly HTML with a single command. Store templates in cloud storage (e.g., Google Drive) for team access and collaborative edits. Compliance Checklist Managers (e.g. OpenCompliance, OpenSCAP) OpenSCAP (Security Content Automation Protocol) automates compliance audits against frameworks like NIST or ISO 27001. Workflow: Deploy OpenSCAP in a virtual environment (e.g., Docker) to scan systems for compliance gaps. Generate automated reports linking findings to manual sections requiring updates. Integrate with issue trackers (e.g., GitHub Issues) to assign remediation tasks. Best Practice: Combine open-source tools with freemium tiers of cloud services (e.g., GitHub Pro for private repos, Google Workspace free tier) to balance automation with accessibility. Plain-Language Generation for Legal Jargon Simplification Legal and regulatory language often obscures clarity, increasing risks of misinterpretation. Plain-language generators reframe complex terms while preserving compliance precision, ensuring documents remain actionable for non-legal stakeholders. Step-by-Step Workflow Using Hemingway Editor and Grammarly Initial Drafting Draft compliance sections using standard legal templates, ensuring all regulatory requirements are included. Avoid abbreviations or jargon (e.g., "pursuant to" → "as required by"). Hemingway Editor for Readability Upload the draft to Hemingway Editor (free web version) to: Highlight complex sentences (color-coded by readability score). Suggest simplifications (e.g., "shall" → "must," "heretofore" → "previously"). Reduce passive voice (e.g., "It is required that..." → "You must..."). Grammarly for Precision Paste the Hemingway-optimized text into Grammarly (free tier) to: Flag ambiguous phrasing (e.g., "may" vs. "shall" in obligations). Ensure consistency in terminology (e.g., "data subject" vs. "individual"). Check for accidental deletions of critical clauses (e.g., "without prejudice"). Legal Review Validation Submit the revised draft to a compliance officer or legal team for a final check on: Retention of all mandatory language (e.g., "This policy complies with [Regulation X]"). Alignment with industry standards (e.g., FTC guidelines for transparency). Caution: Plain-language tools should not replace legal review. Always cross-reference simplified versions against original regulatory texts to avoid omissions. Integrating Compliance Management Software on a Limited Budget Compliance management software (CMS) often requires substantial investments, but organizations can adopt scalable solutions by prioritizing core features, leveraging free trials, and negotiating tiered pricing. Focus on tools that offer modular functionalities to align with budget constraints. Workflow for Cost-Effective CMS Adoption Feature Prioritization Assess compliance needs and map them to CMS features. Prioritize based on: Category Essential Features Budget-Friendly Alternatives Document Management Version control, audit trails Google Drive + Track Changes Risk Assessment Automated gap analysis OpenSCAP + Spreadsheet templates Training Tracking Certification logs, reminders Notion databases + free LMS like Moodle Reporting Regulatory dashboards Excel/Google Sheets + manual templates Tool Selection and Negotiation Target freemium or open-core CMS platforms (e.g., Osano, ComplianceQuest) and: Request free trials to evaluate usability before committing. Negotiate annual contracts for discounts (e.g., 10–20% off for multi-year agreements). Ask for feature-limited free tiers (e.g., Osano’s free plan includes basic GDPR tools). Phased Implementation Deploy CMS incrementally to manage costs: Start with a single module (e.g., policy repository) and expand as budget allows. Use free integrations (e.g., Zapier for connecting CMS to email/SMS alerts). Outsource complex setups (e.g., API integrations) to freelancers on platforms like Upwork. Example: A mid-sized healthcare provider reduced CMS costs by 60% by using ComplianceQuest’s free tier for HIPAA documentation and supplementing with Notion for team collaboration. Collaborative Platforms as Cost-Effective Alternatives Proprietary compliance tools often include redundant features for drafting, reviewing, and distributing manuals. Collaborative platforms like Notion and Google Workspace replicate these functionalities at minimal cost, with added benefits of real-time collaboration and cloud accessibility. Workflow for Remote Team Compliance Drafting Centralized Document Repository Use Google Drive or Notion to store compliance manuals as: Shared Google Docs with version history Case Studies: Real-World Examples of Cheap Compliance Manuals Compliance manuals need not be expensive to be effective. Real-world examples demonstrate how organizations across sectors—from small businesses to nonprofits and startups—have developed affordable, risk-mitigating manuals by leveraging cost-saving strategies, volunteer expertise, and regulatory flexibility. These case studies illustrate structural optimizations, tool utilization, and industry-specific adaptations that reduce development costs without compromising compliance integrity. Small Business Compliance Manual: Café Adherence to Health and Safety Laws A family-owned café in Portland, Oregon, developed a $250 compliance manual for food safety, workplace safety, and accessibility regulations by focusing on modular, template-based documentation and regulatory exemptions. The manual structured compliance into three core sections: operational protocols, employee training records, and audit checklists, each aligned with OSHA, FDA, and ADA requirements. Cost-saving techniques included: Regulatory exemptions: Utilized the FDA’s Retail Food Establishment Model Forms (free, publicly available) for food safety plans, reducing drafting costs by 60%. Employee involvement: Trained staff to self-audit using a weekly checklist (digitized via Google Forms), eliminating the need for external consultants. Shared templates: Adapted OSHA’s Small Business Handbook for workplace safety, modifying it to include café-specific hazards (e.g., slip-resistant flooring protocols). Risk mitigation: Included a one-page "Audit Survival Guide" with step-by-step responses to common inspector queries, reducing potential fines by preemptively addressing gaps. Structural breakdown: Section Key Components Cost-Saving Method Operational Protocols Food handling, temperature logs, pest control FDA Model Forms + café-specific annotations Employee Training OSHA 10-hour certification records In-house training with volunteer oversight Audit Checklists ADA accessibility review, fire exit signs DIY inspections with digital photo documentation Audit risk reduction: The café passed two unannounced health inspections in 18 months with zero citations, attributing success to the manual’s preemptive documentation and employee accountability framework. The total cost included only $150 for printing and $100 for a volunteer lawyer’s review of high-risk sections. Nonprofit Grant Reporting Compliance Manual via Volunteer Expertise A mid-sized nonprofit in Chicago, Community First, developed a $0 compliance manual for federal grant reporting (e.g., HUD, NIH) by repurposing shared templates from peer organizations and engaging pro bono legal volunteers. The project spanned 8 weeks and relied on three key resources: 1. Grantor-provided templates (e.g., NIH’s "Financial Status Report" guidelines). 2. Nonprofit consortium tools (e.g., National Council of Nonprofits’ compliance toolkit). 3. Volunteer expertise from a retired grants manager (3 hours/week). Development timeline and tools: Week 1–2: Assembled a master template combining HUD’s "Uniform Guidance" requirements with NIH’s "Cost Principles" section. Week 3–4: Volunteers cross-referenced templates with past audit findings from similar nonprofits (shared via Nonprofit Ready’s public database). Week 5–6: Created a decision tree for common reporting errors (e.g., indirect cost allocation) using Lucidchart (free tier). Week 7–8: Finalized a 30-page manual with embedded hyperlinks to grantor FAQs and a quarterly review calendar. Cost-saving strategies: Zero external costs: All tools were free (Google Docs, Canva for infographics, Nonprofit Ready’s templates). Shared knowledge: Leveraged webinars from the Urban Institute on grant compliance trends to preemptively address risks. Volunteer specialization: Assigned tasks based on expertise (e.g., a former auditor reviewed financial disclosures). Impact: The manual reduced grant reporting errors by 40% in the first year and eliminated two potential audits by clarifying indirect cost documentation. The nonprofit later monetized the template by selling it to 15 smaller organizations for $50 each, recouping development costs. Startup Compliance Manuals: Fintech vs. Biotech Cost Comparisons Two startups—PayFlow (fintech) and BioGenics (biotech)—developed compliance manuals under $10,000 each but employed distinct strategies due to regulatory environments. PayFlow (Fintech – $8,500 manual): Regulatory sandbox: Operated under UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) sandbox, delaying full compliance until post-launch. This reduced upfront costs by 30%. Simplified disclosures: Used FCA’s "Consumer Duty" template for product terms, cutting drafting time by 50%. Automated monitoring: Integrated RegTech tools (e.g., ComplyAdvantage’s free tier) for AML/KYC checks, reducing manual documentation. Structural focus: Prioritized three high-risk areas (fraud prevention, data privacy, and consumer rights) with modular policies (e.g., a 5-page GDPR addendum). BioGenics (Biotech – $9,200 manual): Pre-competitive collaboration: Shared a draft compliance manual with a university lab under the same FDA oversight, reducing redundant research. Regulatory pre-approvals: Leveraged FDA’s "Small Business Assistance" program for free pre-submission meetings, clarifying requirements before drafting. External partnerships: Paid a single consultant ($5,000) to review only high-risk sections (e.g., clinical trial documentation), avoiding full manual reviews. Structural focus: Divided into four phases (pre-clinical, Phase I–III, post-market) with placeholders for future updates, delaying full development. Cost-saving comparison: Strategy PayFlow (Fintech) BioGenics (Biotech) Regulatory flexibility FCA sandbox (delayed full compliance) FDA pre-submission meetings (clarified gaps) Template reuse FCA Consumer Duty template NIH’s "Good Clinical Practice" guidelines Automation RegTech for AML/KYC EHR-integrated documentation (Epic Systems) External costs $3,000 (RegTech + volunteer lawyer) $5,000 (single consultant for high-risk areas) Manual structure Modular policies (3 high-risk areas) Phase-based (pre-clinical to post-market) Key insight: Fintech startups benefit from regulatory sandboxes and simplified disclosures, while biotech firms rely on pre-competitive sharing and phased documentation. Both avoided full-scale manuals by targeting high-risk, high-impact sections first. Publicly Available Compliance Manual Summary: Affordability Hacks and Limitations A 2022 compliance manual from Small Business Compliance (SBC), a nonprofit, was analyzed for its budget-friendly approaches and inherent trade-offs. "Affordability hacks used in the SBC manual: 1. Regulatory mapping: Cross-referenced all applicable laws (e.g., OSHA, ADA, HIPAA) into a single flowchart, reducing redundancy. 2. Dynamic templates: Used fillable PDFs (via DocuSign templates) for recurring forms (e.g., incident reports), cutting preparation time by 40%. 3. Volunteer QA: Assigned industry veterans to review one section each, leveraging pro bono expertise. 4. Audit trail integration: Embedded Google Sheets tracking for inspections, allowing real-time updates without manual logs. 5. Public domain tools: Relied on OSHA’s eTools and ADA’s "Checklist for Small Businesses" for foundational content." Limitations and risks: Scalability: The manual’s modular approach worked for businesses under 50 employees but required customization for larger teams. Regional gaps: Focused on U.S. federal laws, omitting state-specific regulations (e.g., California’s SB 1386 for data breaches). Static content: Templates lacked AI-driven Developing a cheap compliance manual is not about sacrificing rigor for affordability but about rethinking how documentation is structured, created, and maintained. From modular frameworks that allow targeted updates to visual-first alternatives that enhance readability, the solutions outlined here demonstrate that cost efficiency and regulatory compliance can coexist. By adopting these strategies, organizations can mitigate risks, streamline processes, and allocate resources more effectively—ultimately fostering long-term operational resilience.

     • budget-friendly regulations
     • compliance manuals
     • cost-effective risk management
     • legal documentation strategies
     • small business compliance

     Leave a Comment

     Name

     Comment

     Post Comment

     Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of ir.msu.ac.zw.